Community health assessment via data collection and analysis is an essential constituent of community health indoctrination. One benefit of using GIS application is that it is effective in gathering community-based information about given community to understand health issues at the proletarian level (Graham, Carlton, Gaede, & Jamison, 2011). One limitation of using GIS application is the limiting capacity in […]
A study by Ku & Kegels (2014) was aimed at investigating variances in diabetes knowledge, attitudes and perceptions (KAP), self-care practices as related to assessment of chronic illness care among people with diabetes consulting, in a family physician-led tertiary hospital-based out-patient clinic versus local government health unit-based health centers in the Philippines. Interviewers were performed using questionnaires revised from […]
In the field of public health, qualitative data can paint a detailed picture of public health problems, contributing factors, communities, and community needs. Qualitative data may be used to inform researchers about what to measure next, and provide richness to existing quantitative data by offering an understanding of a community’s true experiences. Collecting qualitative data […]
Public health research has traditionally focused on problems, deficiencies, disease, and contributing factors to public health problems. In recent years, community health assessments have also included community assets or resources. The process of identifying these contributions to the public health of a community is called asset mapping. One strategy for identifying assets is geographic information system […]
Community stakeholders are those community members that have a stake in the health interests of such community. They play significant role in the community’s health and performance. Without community stakeholders, health assessment will not provide desired results. It is a remainder to note that community stakeholders can be internal or external in nature. A […]
Community participation is essential to the planning process—whether it entails a planning to engage community participants or delivering community health assessment outcomes. The two listening strategies observed in the Laureate Education (2012) media format was the idea that organizational leaders listen and understand the concerns and problems of the community members. The community health workers […]
In addition to listening strategy, accurate reading and data interpretation are equally substantial. I encountered a situation where being mindful of potential biases was the accountability of not only those who design, participate and analyze research in public health, but also those who read the research assessment and make policy and other decisions–based on the […]
Awareness of possible partialities is important for both public health assessors and policymakers, in a community health assessment: for assessors when crafting and steering studies, and for policymakers when reading study reports and making verdicts. It is highly important to access risk of bias in all studies review irrespective of preventive unpredictability, in […]
One benefit of using qualitative date when conducting a community health assessment is that the assessor can broaden evidence from understanding behavior pattern and activities of information, not necessarily numerical and quantity in formation. By the same token, the approach could be one in which the assessor makes use of knowledge claim, based mainly on […]
The United States (US) has the most expensive health care system in the world. In spite of that, health care is of somewhat inconsistent in quality, and leads to poorer health outcomes relative to other, similar nations. For example, the United States has much higher infant mortality rates regardless of geographical focus. The result is […]
